ANALYSIS: Hi-tech mapping risks land rights across digital divide
Wed, Nov 28, 2018 – Page 4
ANALYSIS: Hi-tech mapping risks land rights across digital divide Thomson Reuters Foundation, BANGKOK
Countries are increasingly embracing drones and satellites to map land and minimize conflict rising from ownership disputes, but unequal access to the technologies can further endanger the rights of vulnerable people, analysts have said.
With the easy availability of uncrewed aerial vehicles, satellites and GPS, countries from Kenya to the Philippines are able to quickly survey areas that would otherwise require trained staff to manually record data.
However, experts said that those strategies could undermine the land claims of people living in such regions if they are not connected to the Internet and are unable to take part in the process.
Several Indian states are using drones and satellites to update land records dating back to the colonial era.
The Philippines in December last year became one of the first nations in Asia to unveil an official policy allowing drone-assisted surveys for land titling.
In a country where legal titles cover only half the property, titling a plot of land requires submitting a survey for government approval.
That can be expensive and time-consuming, said Rhea Lyn Dealca at the Foundation for Economic Freedom, a Philippines-based advocacy group that has joined government officials, service providers and community leaders in pilot projects.
“Drones reduce the cost and time of surveys, and unlike traditional survey maps, the high-resolution photographic maps help residents verify their lots more easily,” she said.
“Community participation is important, even with more sophisticated technology,” she added.
Satellites and drones can significantly extend a government’s reach — particularly in rural areas — and increase accuracy and efficiency, said Beth Roberts, a program manager at the land rights advocacy group Landesa in Seattle.
Where governments do not have adequate resources, civil society and land users themselves can use drones and other technologies to establish and verify boundaries, she said.
However, residents must be able to participate in the processes and validate the information, which can be a challenge if they do not have access to the Internet, Roberts said.
“Billions of people remain unconnected to the Internet. As governments shift to high-tech tools to map and record land rights, the digital divide has the potential to further marginalize rural communities and individuals,” she said.
Roberts said that people must be informed of their land rights and be empowered to ensure that they are respected.
“This is especially important for groups and individuals who are likely to be excluded — among them women and youth,” she said.
In Indonesia, rights groups said that millions of people have been denied legal titles because they live in conflict areas that fall outside the government’s mapping exercise, which it says applies only to places where land title is “clean and clear.”
However, non-state groups have also seized on technology to provide legal titles.
In Myanmar’s Kayin State, a decades-long fight for autonomy killed hundreds and forced tens of thousands of people from their homes.
The war officially ended in 2012, when the Karen National Union and the military signed a ceasefire, but rights groups said threats to land tenure security have increased since then.
Rising investor interest in logging and mining, and the Burmese government’s move to set aside protected areas, raise the risk of land expropriation, said Saw Alex Htoo at the Karen Environmental and Social Action Network.
This story has been viewed 542 times.
Listing from 2018-11-21 to 2018-11-28
- Most read
- Most e-mailed
- 1 HK activists warn against China
- 2 2018 ELECTIONS: Lai offers to resign as DPP routed
- 3 The Liberty Times Editorial: Bruce Jacobs, friend and benefactor
- 4 British man seeks China state TV ban in the UK for airing forced confession
- 5 World Business Quick Take
- 1 2018 ELECTIONS: Lai offers to resign as DPP routed
- 2 2018 ELECTIONS: Tainan winner downplays victory
- 3 HK activists warn against China
- 4 DPP’s losses blamed on ‘neutral’ policy decisions
- 5 2018 Referendums: Proposals against DPP’s energy plans sail through